Bug#517707: [Debichem-devel] Bug#517707: ☹

2010-02-15 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Michael Banck dixit: >Well, I'm not set on CDBS, we can migrate mopac7 to debhelper Yay! ;-) >if we can more easily work around the bug then No idea about that off-hand, though. I'd have to look. >transition as well, so I would like to see this move forward. Mh. Similar to how I have specific

Bug#517707: [Debichem-devel] Bug#517707: ☹

2010-02-15 Thread Michael Banck
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 03:25:16PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Michael Banck dixit: > > >Did you do some more work on this, you mentioned > > > >01:48 < mira> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root1589 Jan 24 00:47 > >mopac7_1.15-1_mipsel.changes > > Yes, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2010/01/m

Bug#517707: [Debichem-devel] Bug#517707: ☹

2010-02-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Michael Banck dixit: >Did you do some more work on this, you mentioned > >01:48 < mira> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root1589 Jan 24 00:47 >mopac7_1.15-1_mipsel.changes Yes, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2010/01/msg9.html In short: we could force -g0 for gcc, g++, gfortran, ... on some ar

Bug#517707: [Debichem-devel] Bug#517707: ☹

2010-02-14 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 03:29:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Sorry, I tried, but I couldn’t find a way to work around this > toolchain bug for this package; apparently, gfortran includes > symbols apparently. Did you do some more work on this, you mentioned 01:48 < mira> -rw-r--r-- 1 r