Hello,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:50:46AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Alexander Gattin (xr...@yandex.ru):
P.S. Christian, what's your opinion on the issue?
I should have one? :-)
It would be nice if you do :). Maybe you faced
similar discussions in the past?
I generally trust
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:40:17PM +, Alexander Gattin wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:50:46AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Alexander Gattin (xr...@yandex.ru):
P.S. Christian, what's your opinion on the issue?
I should have one? :-)
It would be nice if you
Hello again,
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:19:09PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
you absolutely don't get it. I give the two most used
configurations
(i.e. pdnsd-recurse.conf and pdnsd-resolvconf.conf)
for free, namely:
* local cache, slave to your ISP or dhcp servers, through the
Quoting Alexander Gattin (xr...@yandex.ru):
P.S. Christian, what's your opinion on the issue?
I should have one? :-)
I generally trust Pierre's advice and experience on many issues, so I
don't feel like interfering in your discussion which I don't have the
background for...would be a good
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:07:44PM +, Alexander Gattin wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:03:17PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
FWIW I talked with several DD who all believed
you're wrong. Any package that ships themes e.g.
does that.
probably, this whole argument does not deserve an
Hello,
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:21:15AM +, Alexander Gattin wrote:
you have totally screwed up the Policy's
definitions and intentions: regardless of
whether it's a conffile or Config File, local
changes must be
I do not understand why did you introduce the
AUTO_MODE at all? Probably, you wanted to help
users configuring pdnsd by making it
accomplishable through dpkg-reconfigure pdnsd?
If so, then amount of behavoiur which is exposed
to dpkg-reconfigure pdnsd is obviously
insufficient (server_ip?
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 01:15:31PM +, Alexander Gattin wrote:
I do not understand why did you introduce the
AUTO_MODE at all? Probably, you wanted to help
users configuring pdnsd by making it
accomplishable through dpkg-reconfigure pdnsd?
If so, then amount of behavoiur which is exposed
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 03:19:09PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Oh boy, you absolutely don't get it.
of course I do,
I give the two most used configurations for free
yes, and while it's perfectly OK regarding your
intentions, the manner in which it's implemented
isn't.
If you're not in
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:32:08PM +, Alexander Gattin wrote:
As I've said earlier, it's OK with me to choose
resolvconf mode. Yet I'd be grateful to pdnsd to
allow me (1) to choose a mode, (2) make small
modifications to its behaviour and (3) to keep
them across upgrades.
It's what it
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:03:17PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
It's not, many packages do the same,
?
In the next upload I'll make it very clear in
the /usr files that those are not meant to be
edited by the user, and will be overwritten by
an upgrade
a large billboard that says in
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:21:15AM +, Alexander Gattin wrote:
Hello, Pierre,
you have totally screwed up the Policy's definitions and intentions:
regardless of whether it's a conffile or Config File, local changes
must be preserved during a package upgrade.
I'm speechless...
No I'm not
Hello, Pierre,
you have totally screwed up the Policy's definitions and intentions:
regardless of whether it's a conffile or Config File, local changes
must be preserved during a package upgrade.
--
WBR,
xrgtn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: pdnsd
Version: 1.2.7-par-1
Severity: serious
pdnsd stopped responding to requests from tap0 interface after the
package was updated. It appears to be a direct result of Debian policy
violations.
10.7.2 Location
Any configuration files created or used by your package must reside
in
14 matches
Mail list logo
