On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:40:02PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> > tags 518735 patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
>
> Thanks for the patch!, ... but unfortunately it is not
tags 518735 - patch
thanks
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
> tags 518735 patch
> thanks
>
> Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
Thanks for the patch!, ... but unfortunately it is not enough (hence I'm
temporarily untagging this bug with
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please prove me wrong in wanting this package removed from testing
> Hi
>
> Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
>
> I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
> soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
> be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
>
> Please prove me wrong in wanting this package rem
tags 518735 patch
thanks
Hi
Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
--- ACE_wrappers/m4/ace_defines.m4 2008/09/18 18:56:13 82783
+++ ACE_wrappers/m4/ace_defines.m4 2008/09/18 21:22:05 82784
@@ -20,12 +20,12 @@
#---
Package: ace
Version: 5.6.3-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090307 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> cd /build/user-ace_5.6.3-5-amd64-VEfFO8/ace-5.6.3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 518735 - patch
Bug #518735 [ace] ace: FTBFS: autotools error
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> tags 518735 - patch
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
>> tags 518735 patch
>> thanks
>>
>> Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
>
> Thanks for the patch!, ... but unf
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
> The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
> autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
> AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r) in ACE_wrappers/configure.ac:
>
> checking for bsearch... yes
> ../ACE_wrappers/configure
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> > The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
> > autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
> > AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r) in ACE_wra
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
>>
>> > The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
>> > autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_I
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > I don't see any discussion beyond what is in the bug report on
> > pkg-ace-devel in the last few
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> > I don't see any discussion beyond wh
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:31:34PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01P
(Cross-posting from Debian)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
>
> I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
> soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
> be diagnost
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please don't. I am currently busy but I will h
Hi,
All the files from Thomas are part of the distribution, see
ACE_wrappers/debianbuild. Part is updated, if you have patches for these
debian package file, send them to the list, then we can integrate it.
What is the real problem?
Johnny
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
