On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:45:32AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > My bad. It turns out that 195.36.15 is completely broken upstream; I
> > have no clue how they get it to compile.
>
> I can try and have a look at it. I was trying to see how to best get
> 2.6.33 supported yesterday (although
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:48:32PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Julian Gilbey writes:
> >
> > > No, it was compilation problems, which I think are to do with the
> > > kernel-headers common package business. Indeed, I forgot to a
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Julian Gilbey writes:
>
> > No, it was compilation problems, which I think are to do with the
> > kernel-headers common package business. Indeed, I forgot to attach the
> > log - attached this time!
>
> This is some other problem,
Julian Gilbey writes:
> No, it was compilation problems, which I think are to do with the
> kernel-headers common package business. Indeed, I forgot to attach the
> log - attached this time!
This is some other problem, given that nvidia builds fine for me against
the same kernel but on i386 (I
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 03:17:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Julian Gilbey writes:
>
> > I tried building the latest version of the modules (195.36.15, based on
> > the 190.53-2 Debian package, with the source updated), but ran into this
> > same problem.
>
> By "this same problem" do you mea
Julian Gilbey writes:
> I tried building the latest version of the modules (195.36.15, based on
> the 190.53-2 Debian package, with the source updated), but ran into this
> same problem.
By "this same problem" do you mean the specific error message in this bug
report, namely:
> | install -m 064
I tried building the latest version of the modules (195.36.15, based
on the 190.53-2 Debian package, with the source updated), but ran into
this same problem. I can't figure out the instructions and
suggestions in this bug report, so I just ran a plain m-a on it, and
it died (in exactly the same w
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Package: nvidia-kernel-source
> Version: 180.44-2
> Severity: normal
>
> The bug log for this bug states that build of the modules works when
> using module-assistant. I'm finding that when I attempt to build the
> modules with:
>
>
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 180.44-2
Severity: normal
The bug log for this bug states that build of the modules works when
using module-assistant. I'm finding that when I attempt to build the
modules with:
module-assistant build -l 2.6.29-2-amd64 nvidia-kernel
the build fails wit
9 matches
Mail list logo
