On Mon Mar 30 16:25, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Looking at the bug report more closely, the root cause might actually
> > be something to do with:
> >
> > update-alternatives: warning: alternative /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/jar.1.gz
> > (part of link group jar.1.gz) doesn't exist. Removing from list of
>
Matthew Johnson schrieb:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Do you have any reason to believe that jarwrapper breaks fastjar? I have
> no idea how it possibly could; the maintainer scripts just cass
> update-binfmts, but the problem would seem to be:
>
> update-alternatives: error: alternative jar.1.gz can't be
Hi Matthias,
Do you have any reason to believe that jarwrapper breaks fastjar? I have
no idea how it possibly could; the maintainer scripts just cass
update-binfmts, but the problem would seem to be:
update-alternatives: error: alternative jar.1.gz can't be slave of jar:
it is a master alternativ
3 matches
Mail list logo
