On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 08:34:54PM +0200, Petr Pudlak wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> >
> > It is a pity to have a Debian Policy so well documented, to point
> > package-making learners to that Policy and then have non-conformant
> > builders.
> >
>
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >
> > > No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build" target, you
> > > _must_
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:11 +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >
> > > No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build" target, you
> > > _must_ satisf
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:52:07PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>
> Filippo Rusconi wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>>
No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build
Filippo Rusconi wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build" target, you
_must_ satisfy Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Conflicts-Indep:
And pol
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:11:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> > No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build" target, you
> > _must_ satisfy Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Conflicts-Indep:
> >
> And policy is
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 13:46:30 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> No, policy is very clear on that: if you call the "build" target, you
> _must_ satisfy Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Conflicts-Indep:
>
And policy is clearly not followed by any actual practice on this point.
So that's as much a
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 07:13:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> arch-specific builds run 'debian/rules build && $rootcmd
> debian/rules binary-arch' (where rootcmd is fakeroot or sudo). They
> can't do anything else, because the build-arch target is (still) not
> required.
Sure they can:
deb
Petr Pudlak writes:
> Now I'm just concerned about (violating) Debian Policy (Sect. 4.9). It states
> that the 'build:' target is mandatory. Should I leave 'build:' commented out,
> possibly violating the policy, or perhaps include it just empty, removing its
> dependencies on 'build-arch' and 'b
Hi,
thanks for valuable comments, now it makes more sense to me. The problem was
that my 'build:' target is dependent on build-arch and build-indep targets (as
generated by dh_make when I started with the project). When pbuilder invokes
'debian/rules build', both these targets are called.
I l
Hello,
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Petr Pudlak wrote:
> The problem is that if pbuilder is invoked with --binary-arch, it still tries
> to build the whole project, including the documentation (indep). It looks to
> me as if the problem
> is with pbuilder (or with the tools it's invoking), but of course
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 19:01:41 +0200, Petr Pudlak wrote:
> Hi, I was trying to attend a reported bug (#521918) of a recently uploaded
> package 'eprover', but unfortunately I didn't know what to do about it. I've
> already asked on debian-mentors, but nobody replied.
>
> The problem is that if
Hi, I was trying to attend a reported bug (#521918) of a recently uploaded
package 'eprover', but unfortunately I didn't know what to do about it. I've
already asked on debian-mentors, but nobody replied.
The problem is that if pbuilder is invoked with --binary-arch, it still tries
to build the wh
13 matches
Mail list logo
