Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
> Well, techincally they're different issues: you can fix #530345 just by
> doing a sourceful upload with no changes, but source changes are needed
> to fix #531219. But it seems you're interested in fixing #531219 already,
> which is excellent. :-)
>
Fair point.. But yes,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:48:55AM +0100, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:
> Looking at this now.
>
> Depends: bitlbee (= ${binary:Version})
>
> The dependency seems right already, it's a binary dep, not a source dep.
> I see other programs just make the dependency less tight by doing
> something lik
Hey, Wilmer.
> forcemerge 530345 531219
> > ASAP. (And by the way there are currently two other RC bugs open, both
> > uncommented since three months.)
> Best of all, the one you're reporting is a dupe. :-)
Well, techincally they're different issues: you can fix #530345 just by
doing a sourceful
Looking at this now.
Depends: bitlbee (= ${binary:Version})
The dependency seems right already, it's a binary dep, not a source dep.
I see other programs just make the dependency less tight by doing
something like
Depends: foo (>= ${source:Version})
Is that the best I can get? :-/
Wilmer.
-
Package: bitlbee-dev
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: grave
bitlbee-dev is currently uninstallable since bitlbee was binNMUed (for the
libevent transition I presume).
See also http://lintian.debian.org/tags/not-binnmuable-all-depends-any.html
Gruesse,
Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Relea
5 matches
Mail list logo
