Bug#534799: Dependency issues?

2009-06-29 Thread Jan Muszynski
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaardd...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:23:05AM -0400, Jan Muszynski wrote: The version of cups in sid (1.3.10-5) has a recommends on ghostcript-cups. ghostcript-cups has a dependency on

Bug#534799: Dependency issues?

2009-06-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 package ghostscript cups forcemerge 532916 534799 thanks On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:19:50AM -0400, Jan Muszynski wrote: The question I have (which cannot be fixed in cups itself) is should the dependency on cups within ghostcript-cups have a

Bug#534799: Dependency issues?

2009-06-27 Thread Jan Muszynski
The version of cups in sid (1.3.10-5) has a recommends on ghostcript-cups. ghostcript-cups has a dependency on cups, but it's unversioned. Does the cups dependency need to be = 1.3.10-5 ? For anyone finding this note that cups is currently stuck in sid apparently waiting on the krb5 transition