Your message dated Mon, 29 Jun 2009 02:35:06 +0200
with message-id <20090629003506.ga26...@jones.dk>
and subject line Re: Bug#534799: Dependency issues?
has caused the Debian Bug report #534799,
regarding ghostscript: amd64 package misses usr lib directory
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
534799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghostscript
Version: 8.64~dfsg-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


current amd64 package of ghostscript

merom:~# ls -la /var/cache/apt/archives/ghostscript_8.64~dfsg-12_amd64.deb 
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 786102 23. Jun 12:17
- /var/cache/apt/archives/ghostscript_8.64~dfsg-12_amd64.deb
merom:~# md5sum /var/cache/apt/archives/ghostscript_8.64~dfsg-12_amd64.deb 
2386643c2bcc2f2e46c1eeeabf280e04
/var/cache/apt/archives/ghostscript_8.64~dfsg-12_amd64.deb

misses /usr/lib/ contents in data.tar.gz

This includes /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftoraster which makes every print task
fail:

merom:~# tail /var/log/cups/error_log
E [27/Jun/2009:11:30:15 +0200] Unable to execute
/usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftoraster: No such file or directory
E [27/Jun/2009:11:30:15 +0200] [Job 1696] Unable to start filter
/ "pdftoraster" - Success.
E [27/Jun/2009:11:30:49 +0200] Unable to execute
/ /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftoraster: No such file or directory
E [27/Jun/2009:11:30:49 +0200] [Job 1696] Unable to start filter
"pdftoraster" - Success.
E [27/Jun/2009:11:30:50 +0200] [Job 0] Unable to convert file 1696 to
printable format!

Downgrading ghostscript to lenny version does not help as it does not
contain /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftoraster either.

Please upload a corrected package soon!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable'), (1, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ghostscript depends on:
ii  debconf [debc 1.5.26                     Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   3.1.3                      Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  defoma        0.11.10-0.2                Debian Font Manager -- automatic f
ii  ghostscript [ 8.64~dfsg-12               The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF
ii  gs-common     8.64~dfsg-12               Dummy package depending on ghostsc
ii  gsfonts       1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii  libc6         2.9-12                     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgs8        8.64~dfsg-12               The Ghostscript PostScript/PDF int

Versions of packages ghostscript recommends:
ii  psfontmgr                    0.11.10-0.2 PostScript font manager -- part of

ghostscript suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:23:05AM -0400, Jan Muszynski wrote:
>The version of cups in sid (1.3.10-5) has a recommends on
>ghostcript-cups. ghostcript-cups has a dependency on cups, but it's
>unversioned. Does the cups dependency need to be >= 1.3.10-5 ? For
>anyone finding this note that cups is currently stuck in sid
>apparently waiting on the krb5 transition (which seems to be waiting
>on some of the architectures other than i386/amd64).

Above is a bug in cups (or the helper packages more directly depending 
on raster filters.  The maintainer of cups is fully aware of the need 
for the new ghostscript-cups package, as that maintainer reqested that 
very change.


>Ghostscript itself should possibly have a recommends, or at least a
>suggests, on ghostcript-cups.

No: Ghostscript benefits in no way from the contents of 
ghostscript-cups.

I will now close this as it is not a bug in ghostscript.


Kind regards, and thanks for your report, anyway :-)

  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkpIDDkACgkQn7DbMsAkQLin5wCeN0+seQDgbEnoFgykJ20n6S8J
ZOgAnj0cBSREPv666TftKEdmlmdp/anp
=e8OG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to