Bug#536498: closed by Nico Golde (Re: Bug#536498: Please backport roundcube CVE-2008-5619)

2009-07-13 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Montag, 13. Juli 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > - in this case it was Holger Levsen. Though, I just asked him and he > said that he doesn't care about etch-backports. given that its not possible/desirable to have backports from squeeze in etch-bpo (see http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bp

Bug#536498: closed by Nico Golde (Re: Bug#536498: Please backport roundcube CVE-2008-5619)

2009-07-13 Thread Holger Levsen
On Montag, 13. Juli 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > - in this case it was Holger Levsen. Though, I just asked him and he > said that he doesn't care about etch-backports. > Given that Holger gives a damn thanks for your understanding and your well done summary of my position. love, Holger

Bug#536498: closed by Nico Golde (Re: Bug#536498: Please backport roundcube CVE-2008-5619)

2009-07-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Benjamin Bannier [2009-07-10 20:08:57 CEST]: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:45:41 +0200 Nico Golde wrote: > > > I see roundcube-0.1.1-10~bpo40+2 still in backports. [..] > > > > That's why I marked this bug as done with the unstable version. > > Sorry, maybe I got confused. I reported this bug here

Bug#536498: closed by Nico Golde (Re: Bug#536498: Please backport roundcube CVE-2008-5619)

2009-07-10 Thread Benjamin Bannier
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:45:41 +0200 Nico Golde wrote: > > I see roundcube-0.1.1-10~bpo40+2 still in backports. [..] > > That's why I marked this bug as done with the unstable version. Sorry, maybe I got confused. I reported this bug here because the backports version was listed in the list of De

Bug#536498: closed by Nico Golde (Re: Bug#536498: Please backport roundcube CVE-2008-5619)

2009-07-10 Thread Alexander Wirt
Benjamin Bannier schrieb am Friday, den 10. July 2009: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:45:41 +0200 > Nico Golde wrote: > > > > I see roundcube-0.1.1-10~bpo40+2 still in backports. [..] > > > > That's why I marked this bug as done with the unstable version. > > Sorry, maybe I got confused. I reported

Bug#536498: closed by Nico Golde (Re: Bug#536498: Please backport roundcube CVE-2008-5619)

2009-07-10 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Benjamin Bannier [2009-07-10 17:35]: > thanks for your quick response. > > I see roundcube-0.1.1-10~bpo40+2 still in backports. I presume this > doesn't include the patch to fix this specific issue. That's why I marked this bug as done with the unstable version. > I urge you to please ma

Bug#536498: closed by Nico Golde (Re: Bug#536498: Please backport roundcube CVE-2008-5619)

2009-07-10 Thread Benjamin Bannier
Hi, thanks for your quick response. I see roundcube-0.1.1-10~bpo40+2 still in backports. I presume this doesn't include the patch to fix this specific issue. I urge you to please make a version bump to backports since this is a security issue. Thanks, Benjamin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to