Bug#549758: gtk+extra2: FTBFS: configure.in:33: error: possibly undefined macro: LT_CURRENT

2009-10-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: gtk+extra2 Version: 2.1.1-6 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC

Processed: Re: Bug#549758: gtk+extra2: FTBFS: configure.in:33: error: possibly undefined macro: LT_CURRENT

2009-10-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 549758 + confirmed Bug #549758 [src:gtk+extra2] gtk+extra2: FTBFS: configure.in:33: error: possibly undefined macro: LT_CURRENT Added tag(s) confirmed. retitle 549758 gtk+extra2: FTBFS: GtkEntry has no member named n_bytes Bug #549758

Bug#549758: gtk+extra2: FTBFS: configure.in:33: error: possibly undefined macro: LT_CURRENT

2009-10-05 Thread Neil Williams
tag 549758 + confirmed retitle 549758 gtk+extra2: FTBFS: GtkEntry has no member named n_bytes quit On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:23:34 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote: During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. I've been waiting for this.

Bug#549758: gtk+extra2: FTBFS: configure.in:33: error: possibly undefined macro: LT_CURRENT

2009-10-05 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: Ludovic: now is the time to adopt gtk+extra2 and/or subsume it into Ada. I don't think we can wait for upstream to do something in 8 months time. Honestly, I don't think adoption is the right approach. Either libgtkada subsumes the parts of gtk+extra2