Bug#549772: Update?

2010-06-02 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
retitle 549772 RM: router-audit-tool -- RoM; FTBFS and licensing issues in new upstream version thanks On mer., 2010-06-02 at 20:53 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 20:22:17 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > reassign 549772 ftp.debian.org > > retitle 549772 RM: RoM FTBFS

Processed: Re: Bug#549772: Update?

2010-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 549772 RM: router-audit-tool -- RoM; FTBFS and licensing issues in > new upstream version Bug #549772 [ftp.debian.org] RM: RoM FTBFS and licensing issues in new upstream version Changed Bug title to 'RM: router-audit-tool -- RoM; FTBFS a

Bug#549772: Update?

2010-06-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 20:22:17 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > reassign 549772 ftp.debian.org > retitle 549772 RM: RoM FTBFS and licensing issues in new upstream version you failed to include the package name here... > thanks > On mer., 2010-06-02 at 16:36 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe

Bug#549772: Update?

2010-06-02 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
reassign 549772 ftp.debian.org retitle 549772 RM: RoM FTBFS and licensing issues in new upstream version thanks On mer., 2010-06-02 at 16:36 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:41:46AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > what's the status on this? Has the situa

Processed: Re: Bug#549772: Update?

2010-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 549772 ftp.debian.org Bug #549772 [src:router-audit-tool] router-audit-tool: FTBFS: only nested arrays of non-refs are supported at /usr/share/perl/5.10/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm line 664 Bug reassigned from package 'src:router-audit-tool'

Bug#549772: Update?

2010-06-02 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:41:46AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > what's the status on this? Has the situation improved since january, or > should the removal be asked to ftpmasters? The removal of this package should be requested. Regards Javier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc

Bug#549772: Update?

2010-05-30 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
> Due to the change in licensing terms, and the fact that it is not that much > used by Debian users (based on popcon) I'm actually going to ask ftpmasters > to remove this package. > Hey, what's the status on this? Has the situation improved since january, or should the removal be asked to ftp