On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:46:40 +0100
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote:
Consequently libctapimkt0-dev was removed from testing (since a long
time) and this is correct for this package.
A wishlist for a common interface doesn't seem to me to be sufficient
to stop the library getting into
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:08:02AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
Feel free to cancel the delayed upload.
I do not see a reason to make your work on this really wasted.
However, from your description I
still don't see why it should not be in Squeeze.
Because it is not in Squeeze any more and we
clone 557495 -1
reassign 557495 towitoko
found 557495 2.0.7-8.1
reassign -1 libctapimkt
found -1 1.0.1-1
quit
As no other solution has actually been uploaded, I propose that the two
packages involved should both be changed to use sub-directories just
like the one other library containing the
Hi Neil,
thanks for your effort in solving this.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:44:17PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
As no other solution has actually been uploaded, I propose that the two
packages involved should both be changed to use sub-directories just
like the one other library containing
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:47:47 +0100
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Neil,
thanks for your effort in solving this.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:44:17PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
As no other solution has actually been uploaded, I propose that the
two packages involved should both
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:12:23PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
The fact that there is now a
workaround seems to decrease the presure onto this clean solution.
I'm not at all sure why the solution has to be in one or other library
as if code including the header (none of which is in Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo
