Bug#562945: runinit-run, releaseability thereof

2010-08-31 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:07:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable, > > > please indicate as such; ot

Bug#562945: runinit-run, releaseability thereof

2010-08-30 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable, > > please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the > > maintainer to downgrade t

Bug#562945: runinit-run, releaseability thereof

2010-08-21 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 08/20/2010 01:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > Daniel, can you please remove this binary package from unstable? rather than that, i've downgraded the depends to suggests. note that if you unblock live-config 2.0.x that you want to unblock live-boot 2.0.x too. -- Address:Daniel Baumann,

Bug#562945: runinit-run, releaseability thereof

2010-08-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 17:07:22 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > After some discussion, we feel that the fact that runit-run can be > installed, and unless further manual action is taken, it will make the > computer unbootable to indicate that the package is unreleaseable. > It's not getting remove

Bug#562945: runinit-run, releaseability thereof

2010-08-06 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote: > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable, > please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the > maintainer to downgrade the severity of this bug if the maintainer > feels that it is releasable

Bug#562945: runinit-run, releaseability thereof

2010-07-27 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote: > * We decided to refer to the Release Team the question as to >whether the package is releaseable in its current state. > > So, we would appreciate it if you would take a look at this situation > and decide. When you've decided you should probably set

Bug#562945: runinit-run, releaseability thereof

2010-07-08 Thread Ian Jackson
The package runinit-run, if successfully installed, generally breaks the system by breaking booting. The administrator is supposed to fix up the boot arrangements by converting startup scripts etc. after installing runinit-run. The administrator's attention is drawn to this by a debconf question: