On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 21:09:05 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
should it be removed from lenny also?
No.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 23/04/10 at 21:09 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:48:28 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/03/10 at 15:47 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:23:29 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/04/10 at 21:09 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:48:28 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/03/10 at 15:47 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:48:28 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 06/03/10 at 15:47 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for ruby1.9. Note this was
On 06/03/10 at 15:47 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for ruby1.9. Note this was fixed in 1.9.1, and it isn't
really clear whether it affects 1.9.
On 06/03/10 at 15:47 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.5-1
Hi,
Will check at some point. But before someone NMU 1.9.0.5-1, remember
that this version is supposed to be dropped before the squeeze release
(replaced by 1.9.1.X).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
|
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for ruby1.9. Note this was fixed in 1.9.1, and it isn't
really clear whether it affects 1.9. I can't find enough info to say
either way. Please check.
7 matches
Mail list logo