Hi,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> I have uploaded febootstrap 2.7-1 to Debian.
>
> Unfortunately, this version still segfault:
> Complete!
> /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 1: 17946 Segmentation fault exit $RESULT
[...]
> febootstrap-run: problem parsing the command
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> Do you get those segfaults as well if you run febootstrap with
> --no-clean?
I still have a single segfault instead of the bunch of segfaults:
Complete!
/usr/bin/febootstrap: line 93: 15649 Segmentation fault [
"$clean" = "yes" ]
> If
severity 576250 normal
thanks
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 08:49:42PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Do you get those segfaults as well if you run febootstrap with
> > --no-clean?
>
> I still have a single segfault instead of the bunch of segfau
Hi,
I'm using febootstrap since some week and indeed, I'm able to reproduce the bug.
However, I disagree with the severity serious as it doesn't renders
package unusable.
After the segfault and the febootstrap cache removal failure, the
boostrap is functional.
You can chroot and use it as expecte
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 03:04:26AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Anyway, a new upstream release will be appreciated. If you don't mind,
> I could upload a NMU if needed.
Yes please. The version in Debian is ancient.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/
Hi,
I have uploaded febootstrap 2.7-1 to Debian.
Unfortunately, this version still segfault:
Complete!
/usr/bin/fakeroot: line 1: 17946 Segmentation fault exit $RESULT
/usr/bin/fakeroot: line 1: 17947 Segmentation fault exit $RESULT
/usr/bin/fakeroot: line 1: 17948 Segmentation fault
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:45:02AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have uploaded febootstrap 2.7-1 to Debian.
>
> Unfortunately, this version still segfault:
> Complete!
> /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 1: 17946 Segmentation fault exit $RESULT
These segfaults are almost certainly caused by
Hello Fabo,
On Thursday 17 Jun 2010 14:15:02 Fathi Boudra wrote:
> IMHO, the bug should be downgraded to important.
> As I said in a previous mail: the boostrap is functional. You can
> chroot and use it as expected.
I don't recollect now but there were issues with the half baked chroot
environm
8 matches
Mail list logo
