On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:33:53 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org
wrote:
On 0, Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
В 16:15 +0200 на 12.08.2010 (чт), Gürkan Sengün написа:
I see, I don't know, do you have a sponsor?
Of course, how would the packages end up in the archive otherwise :-)
Luca
gurkan wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:33:53 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org
wrote:
Do you intend to upload gorm.app soon?
yes i have the packages ready, as you can see from the gnustep devel
mailinglist,
it's on mentors.debian.org waiting for a sponsor.
Have you contacted potential
On 08/22/2010 03:13 PM, gurkan wrote:
yes i have the packages ready, as you can see from the gnustep devel
mailinglist,
it's on mentors.debian.org waiting for a sponsor.
Uploaded.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 0, Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org wrote:
В 16:15 +0200 на 12.08.2010 (чт), Gürkan Sengün написа:
I see, I don't know, do you have a sponsor?
Of course, how would the packages end up in the archive otherwise :-)
Luca Falavigna dktrkranz and Barry deFreese bdefreese are my
(GNUstep)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 581940 + patch
Bug #581940 [src:gorm.app] gorm.app: FTBFS with gnustep-base/1.20.0:
GormFunctions.m:354: error: âGSMethodListâ undeclared (first use in this
function)
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
tags 581940 + patch
thanks
Hi Gürkan,
Here is a minimal upstream patch that applies against 1.2.10.
2010-03-05 Richard Frith-Macdonald r...@gnu.org
* GormCore/GormFunctions.m: update for latest base library.
=== modified file 'GormCore/GormFunctions.m'
--- GormCore/GormFunctions.m
Hello Yavor
Hi Gürkan,
Here is a minimal upstream patch that applies against 1.2.10.
Shouldn't we upload version 1.2.12?
Yours,
Gurkan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
В 15:44 +0200 на 12.08.2010 (чт), Gürkan Sengün написа:
Shouldn't we upload version 1.2.12?
We're frozen now, and the release team said a patch is preferred to a
new upstream release. It's up to you -- if the changes are sufficiently
small and you can convince them to grant a freeze exception
On 08/12/10 15:55, Yavor Doganov wrote:
В 15:44 +0200 на 12.08.2010 (чт), Gürkan Sengün написа:
Shouldn't we upload version 1.2.12?
We're frozen now, and the release team said a patch is preferred to a
new upstream release. It's up to you -- if the changes are sufficiently
small and you can
В 16:15 +0200 на 12.08.2010 (чт), Gürkan Sengün написа:
I see, I don't know, do you have a sponsor?
Of course, how would the packages end up in the archive otherwise :-)
Luca Falavigna dktrkranz and Barry deFreese bdefreese are my
(GNUstep) sponsors these days -- I usually send an RFS request to
10 matches
Mail list logo
