Hi!
The maintainer of mozilla-devscripts today uploaded a new revision that
uses python-librdf instead of python-rdflib (I wrote the patches). So
uploading a new upstream version of python-rdflib no longer conflicts
with mozilla-devscripts requirements.
WM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
Hi!
I'm CCing the maintainers of mozilla-devscripts, as they should decide
how to proceed.
Am 2010-06-07 13:00, schrieb Nacho Barrientos Arias:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Willi Mann wrote:
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> RDFLib 3.0.0 was recently released. Thus, before uploading a patched
>>> debian
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Willi Mann wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> RDFLib 3.0.0 was recently released. Thus, before uploading a patched
>> debian/rules, I'd like to test whether this issue is reproducible with
>> the new version as well. I'm preparing a package, it would be great if
>> yo
Hi!
> Thanks.
>
> RDFLib 3.0.0 was recently released. Thus, before uploading a patched
> debian/rules, I'd like to test whether this issue is reproducible with
> the new version as well. I'm preparing a package, it would be great if
> you could test it on your mipsel virtual machine. Give me some
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Willi Mann wrote:
> tag 584327 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi!
Hi
>
> Attached is a patch for debian/rules that reduces the optimization level
> to 1 for mipsel and mips, which fixes the problem at least on mipsel.
> (tested, not tested on mips). I would be nice if you c
tag 584327 + patch
thanks
Hi!
Attached is a patch for debian/rules that reduces the optimization level
to 1 for mipsel and mips, which fixes the problem at least on mipsel.
(tested, not tested on mips). I would be nice if you could upload rdflib
with this patch soon.
thanks
Willi
diff -u rdflib-
6 matches
Mail list logo
