Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-26 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Jonathan Yu [101125 14:31]: > Your advice would be greatly appreciated. I'm not sure, if I'm the best to ask for advice for this matter, as I'm just an "RC bug hunter", neither a perl nor a swf developer. But in general I tend to think, that a libmojomojo-perl with limited functionality

Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-25 Thread David Bremner
On 2010-11-25, at 5:31, Jonathan Yu wrote: I'm not sure how to best proceed. I can certainly remove the swfupload stuff from libmojomojo-perl, which will close that RC bug, but it opens another wishlist bug since it's not possible to easily install the "full" libmojomojo-perl as per upstream

Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:31:08 -0500, Jonathan Yu wrote: > I'll spend some time (hopefully tonight) repacking to remove those > parts. Thanks! I hope you find a way to achieve it; from a very quick look at the package some weeks ago just ripping out the "bad" files seems to be not enough but ther

Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-25 Thread Jonathan Yu
Hi, We've spoken to the upstream maintainers, who say that removing the offending swfupload parts should be okay. I'll spend some time (hopefully tonight) repacking to remove those parts. My only concern was that swfupload should be made available in non-free prior to the removal of those parts f

Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-25 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi David! * David Bremner [101113 21:58]: > So I would say not quite yet for removal, but if nothing starts moving > in the next week or so I would not oppose removal. I was looking through open RC bugs and stumbled over this one. I was wondering, if you can report any progress on this bug?

Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-13 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 19:32:48 +, Enrico Zini wrote: > > Considering that the package has a very small number of users, that > we're supposed to release fairly soon, and that this issue looks not > that easy to solve, it may be a good idea to just remove > libmojomojo-perl from testing and deal

Bug#591974: Looks like we should drop libmojomojo-perl for squeeze

2010-11-13 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello, thank you for maintaining mojomojo. libmojomojo-perl 1.01-1 is currently in squeeze and sid and has RC bugs open against it. Considering that the package has a very small number of users, that we're supposed to release fairly soon, and that this issue looks not that easy to solve, it may