swfupload is likely to be licensed under the MIT license:
http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/source/browse/swfupload/tags/swfupload_v2.2.0_beta1/core/swfupload+license.txt?r=786
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:20:08 +0100, Marcus Ramberg mar...@nordaaker.com wrote:
swfupload is likely to be licensed under the MIT license:
http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/source/browse/swfupload/tags/swfupload_v2.2.0_beta1/core/swfupload+license.txt?r=786
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 at 21:01:34 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
I have the impression they are related to
http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/
but I would like to confirm.
For what it's worth, if they're that swfupload, source code is available
(although I don't know whether compilers in
Dear Marcus;
I have been trying to follow up on a Debian Bug in your package:
http://bugs.debian.org/591974
Can you tell me the source for the files in
root/static/flash ?
I have the impression they are related to
http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/
but I would like to confirm.
All
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:01:34 -0300, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote:
Dear Marcus;
I have been trying to follow up on a Debian Bug in your package:
http://bugs.debian.org/591974
Oops, I forgot to ask, would it be reasonable to just disable
swfuploader in MojoMojo?
Sorry to bother
5 matches
Mail list logo