Bug#591974: use of swfuploader in Mojo

2010-11-03 Thread Marcus Ramberg
swfupload is likely to be licensed under the MIT license: http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/source/browse/swfupload/tags/swfupload_v2.2.0_beta1/core/swfupload+license.txt?r=786

Bug#591974: use of swfuploader in Mojo

2010-11-03 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:20:08 +0100, Marcus Ramberg mar...@nordaaker.com wrote: swfupload is likely to be licensed under the MIT license: http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/source/browse/swfupload/tags/swfupload_v2.2.0_beta1/core/swfupload+license.txt?r=786

Bug#591974: use of swfuploader in Mojo

2010-11-02 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 at 21:01:34 -0300, David Bremner wrote: I have the impression they are related to http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/ but I would like to confirm. For what it's worth, if they're that swfupload, source code is available (although I don't know whether compilers in

Bug#591974: use of swfuploader in Mojo

2010-10-24 Thread David Bremner
Dear Marcus; I have been trying to follow up on a Debian Bug in your package: http://bugs.debian.org/591974 Can you tell me the source for the files in root/static/flash ? I have the impression they are related to http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/ but I would like to confirm. All

Bug#591974: use of swfuploader in Mojo

2010-10-24 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:01:34 -0300, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: Dear Marcus; I have been trying to follow up on a Debian Bug in your package: http://bugs.debian.org/591974 Oops, I forgot to ask, would it be reasonable to just disable swfuploader in MojoMojo? Sorry to bother