* Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-11-25, 20:35:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/foobar${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH /foobar:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH can be unset naturally, ie without the user knowing.
It is actually the default. However, if it
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:11:47PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
found 598424 1:1.0.7.4-3
thanks
* Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-10-20, 09:44:
It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of
$TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done, because :
- if
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:58:18PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:11:47PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
found 598424 1:1.0.7.4-3
thanks
* Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-10-20, 09:44:
It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of
found 598424 1:1.0.7.4-3
thanks
* Etienne Millon etienne.mil...@gmail.com, 2010-10-20, 09:44:
It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of
$TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done, because :
- if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is empty before, the ${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+...}
constructs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 598424 1:1.0.7.4-3
Bug #598424 {Done: Atsuhito KOHDA ko...@debian.org} [texmacs] texmacs:
CVE-2010-3394: insecure library loading
Bug Marked as found in versions texmacs/1:1.0.7.4-3; no longer marked as fixed
in versions
Hello,
Does the following sentence relate to my question?
I believe that the second warning can be
safely ignored.
It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of
$TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done, because :
- if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is empty before, the
Hi all, sorry for delay.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:51:07 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
Here is a patch that fixes this issue. I believe that the second warning can
be
safely ignored.
I'm preparing a fixed package but I've a question which
I' like to solve before upload it.
A patch of Etienne
Hi Etienne,
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:44:56 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
Does the following sentence relate to my question?
I believe that the second warning can be
safely ignored.
It does, indeed. On line 30 of /usr/bin/texmacs, the inclusion of
$TEXMACS_BIN_PATH/lib is properly done,
tags 598424 patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
Here is a patch that fixes this issue. I believe that the second warning can be
safely ignored.
Regards,
--
Etienne Millon
diff -u texmacs-1.0.7.4/debian/changelog texmacs-1.0.7.4/debian/changelog
--- texmacs-1.0.7.4/debian/changelog
+++
9 matches
Mail list logo
