Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2012-08-04 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Miguel, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > i would like to see this tested in with daily images, expert mode > using sid to see if the updated grub makes any difference. > Can you test it and give feedback? What change was made in grub? If it is one that directly addressed the problem described here

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2011-03-21 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi, i would like to see this tested in with daily images, expert mode using sid to see if the updated grub makes any difference. Can you test it and give feedback? -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-r

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: >> It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID. >> >> menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian >> --class gnu-linux --class gnu

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: > It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID. > > menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian > --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { > insmod part_msdos > insmod ext2 >

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID. menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd0,msdos5)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set dec7

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
What I don't understand is that in squezze the fstab shows: /etc/fstab # /boot was on /dev/sda5 during installation UUID=dec79ed9-b96a-47e4-81f0-7e32735b5057 /boot ext2 defaults0 2 # /boot2 was on /dev/sdb1 during installation UUID=bb0512c5-6de6-4164-a7af-4312a4718ce3 /boo

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-28 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Lukasz Szybalski, le Thu 28 Oct 2010 19:31:51 -0500, a écrit : >> There was no changes to the bios system. The system was installed then >> rebooted. > > Ok. > It may just be a difference between the order in which modules get > loaded fro

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Lukasz Szybalski, le Thu 28 Oct 2010 19:31:51 -0500, a écrit : > There was no changes to the bios system. The system was installed then > rebooted. Ok. It may just be a difference between the order in which modules get loaded from initrd at reboot and modules get loaded by d-i. But in principle f

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Lukasz Szybalski, le Thu 28 Oct 2010 17:39:59 -0500, a écrit : > 3. Can someone explain why installer mounts sda as my 1GB and sdb as > 1.7TB, but after re-boot system swaps them and uses 1.7TB as /sda and > 1Gb as sdb? It looks like a hardware detection order issue. Do you modify a bios parameter