Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2012-08-04 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Miguel, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: i would like to see this tested in with daily images, expert mode using sid to see if the updated grub makes any difference. Can you test it and give feedback? What change was made in grub? If it is one that directly addressed the problem described here

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2011-03-21 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi, i would like to see this tested in with daily images, expert mode using sid to see if the updated grub makes any difference. Can you test it and give feedback? -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
What I don't understand is that in squezze the fstab shows: /etc/fstab # /boot was on /dev/sda5 during installation UUID=dec79ed9-b96a-47e4-81f0-7e32735b5057 /boot ext2 defaults0 2 # /boot2 was on /dev/sdb1 during installation UUID=bb0512c5-6de6-4164-a7af-4312a4718ce3

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID. menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='(hd0,msdos5)' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID. menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-29 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Lennart Sorensen lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:08:59AM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: It seems like Grub.cfg is also using proper drive by UUID. menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64' --class debian --class

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Lukasz Szybalski, le Thu 28 Oct 2010 17:39:59 -0500, a écrit : 3. Can someone explain why installer mounts sda as my 1GB and sdb as 1.7TB, but after re-boot system swaps them and uses 1.7TB as /sda and 1Gb as sdb? It looks like a hardware detection order issue. Do you modify a bios parameter

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Lukasz Szybalski, le Thu 28 Oct 2010 19:31:51 -0500, a écrit : There was no changes to the bios system. The system was installed then rebooted. Ok. It may just be a difference between the order in which modules get loaded from initrd at reboot and modules get loaded by d-i. But in principle

Bug#601721: installation-reports: Build w/ /boot partition succeeds, but re-boot fails in fsck 445148

2010-10-28 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: Lukasz Szybalski, le Thu 28 Oct 2010 19:31:51 -0500, a écrit : There was no changes to the bios system. The system was installed then rebooted. Ok. It may just be a difference between the order in which modules get