On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 08:45:30 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> There's patch floating arround, which has a major regression: It doesn't
> work for users of self signed certificates.
FWIW: As an offlineimap user I'd be very unhappy if it stopped
working with my IMAP server with its self-si
* Bastian Blank [2010-12-08 10:37 +0100]:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:30AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > #603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user
> > security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking.
>
> Could you explain why it should be
Hi!
Am 08.12.2010 10:37, schrieb Bastian Blank:
> #564690 is an old example of the same problem.
So is #547092 (which has severity important). And I'm sure if we dig
deep enough, we can find others as well.
>> There's patch floating arround, which has a major regression: It doesn't
>> work fo
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:45:30AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> #603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user
> security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking.
Could you explain why it should be acceptable to announce secure
operation but ignore
Hi release manager,
#603450 is a bug (currently with severity grave, Justification: user
security hole), as offlineimap does no ssl certificate checking.
While I agree, that this is a really important feature, which should be
fixed, I'm wondering, if that really is release critical.
There's pa
5 matches
Mail list logo
