On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
The problem is still reproducible. So or this or 550650 (was done 11
Oct) or the other RC must be open (for ex against buildd), but You
(You and Julien) prefer to keep your eyes closed. It's a pity.
It's not an RC bug; at most it is severity
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:32:47 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
The problem is still reproducible. So or this or 550650 (was done 11
Oct) or the other RC must be open (for ex against buildd), but You
(You and Julien) prefer to keep your eyes
DA On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
The problem is still reproducible. So or this or 550650 (was done 11
Oct) or the other RC must be open (for ex against buildd), but You
(You and Julien) prefer to keep your eyes closed. It's a pity.
DA It's not an RC bug; at most it is severity
JC jcris...@franck:~$ dak ls -a i386 jabberd14
JC jabberd14 | 1.6.1.1-5+b1 | testing | i386
JC jabberd14 | 1.6.1.1-5+b1 | unstable | i386
jabberd14_1.6.1.1-5+b1_i386.deb 16-Nov-2010 18:18 347K
Ok, it seems to be solved since Yesterday evening, thanks!
--
... mpd is off
. ''`.
DBTS On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
reopen 603677
thanks
DBTS If a maintainer closes a bug, and after a single round of explanation,
DBTS still does not agree with reopening the bug, the bug should stay
DBTS closed.
Julien isn't maintainer. [1]
DBTS If you disagree with the
5 matches
Mail list logo
