well -- I was aiming experimental with a new cvs snapshot anyways.
I will upload into unstable with your fix
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 03:38 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > thank you guys, you were quick ;-)
> > I am looking into packaging fresh cvs snapshot any
On 12/29/2010 03:38 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> thank you guys, you were quick ;-)
>
> I am looking into packaging fresh cvs snapshot anyways, so will
> simply switch to 3.0 (quilt)
>
Deep freeze is not the best time to switch to 3.0 (quilt). Please don't
switch to 3.0 if you want your packa
thank you guys, you were quick ;-)
I am looking into packaging fresh cvs snapshot anyways, so will simply
switch to 3.0 (quilt)
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> tags 608218 patch
> thanks
> Hi,
> I've just modified its cvs20080204 patch to be applied correctly.
--
=--
tags 608218 patch
thanks
Hi,
I've just modified its cvs20080204 patch to be applied correctly.
>henr...@hp115:~/tmp/lush-1.2.1$ ./debian/rules patch
>test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched
>dpatch apply-all
>applying patch cvs20080204 to ./ ... ok.
>applying patch 01-python to ./
Source: lush
Version: 1.2.1-6+cvs20080204
Severity: serious
Tags: sid squeeze
Justification: rebuilding introduces a severe regression
The cvs20080204 patch doesn't get applied correctly in a sid chroot:
| $ ./debian/rules patch
| test -d debian/patched || install -d debian/patched
| dpatch app
5 matches
Mail list logo
