Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote: Hi, I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auctex in squeeze. This should be straightforward. The fix breaks preview with the version of ghostscript in squeeze (8.71~dfsg2-6.1), and was patched in upstream CVS in October 2010

Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-26 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote: Hi, I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auctex in squeeze. This should be straightforward. The fix breaks preview with the version of ghostscript in squeeze (8.71~dfsg2-6.1), and was

Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-24 Thread Frank Küster
Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote: I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a backport to 11.85 would be reasonable. I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous. Right. So, what's the next step? Wait for the auctex maintainer? Proceed with a

Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-24 Thread Faheem Mitha
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Frank Küster wrote: Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote: I think that getting the fix into a point release ie. 6.1 as a backport to 11.85 would be reasonable. I agree - delaying squeeze because of that would be ridiculous. Right. So, what's the next step? Wait

Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:32:31AM +0530, Faheem Mitha wrote: Heh. Well, that does sound like lots of fun. Unfortunately, as I wrote to Julian Gilbey, I still seem to have breakage, even with this patch. If I set TeX PDF mode to true, ie. It seems that it was my TeX file which was broken.

Processed: Re: Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 610714 serious Bug #610714 [auctex] preview-latex is broken in squeeze (patch in cvs fixes problem) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 610714:

Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 610714 + squeeze-can-defer tag 610714 + squeeze-ignore thanks On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 22:23 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: severity 610714 serious thanks Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote: [...] I think that getting the fix into a point

Processed: Re: Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertag 610714 + squeeze-can-defer Bug#610714: preview-latex is broken in squeeze (patch in cvs fixes problem)

Bug#610714: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-23 Thread Faheem Mitha
Hi Frank, Thanks for your kind message. On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Frank Küster wrote: severity 610714 serious thanks Faheem Mitha fah...@email.unc.edu wrote: On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote: I'd like to get a fix uploaded for