On 19 April 2011 18:42, gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> wrote: > Given the facts that > - this package built fine in my i386 chroot which doesn't have > Â libbsd-dev installed; > - the build log doesn't say anything about libbsd-dev;
no, but libutil.h exists only in libbsd-dev. > - the package built fine everywhere except for armhf yes, this is indeed strange. > I'm a bit skeptical that the build problem on armhf is really about > the missing libbsd-dev package, and that adding it, at least for all > architectures, is the way to go. I agree that it looks strange. Initially I assumed that this package was somehow installed by default on some buildds. > Maybe we should find out why the package looks for libutil.h only on > armhf? Might be the package or something different in perl or whatnot I'd gladly help find the problem if it's armhf-related. After doing a little search it seems that I_DEFUTIL is defined, which is needed for setproctitle() (used in FreeBSD, so it seems that you're right that something is different in armhf perl). I'll do a more thorough search as to why/when I_DEFUTIL is defined and why it is defined only on armhf. Konstantinos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
