tag 628952 pending
--
Hi everyone,
First of all, I'd like to thank everyone for their comments, they were
all very helpful.
And in light of all of this, I think the best approach is first of all
removing the Netgear logo since we're not using it in Debian anyway, and
then replacing the Tux logo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 628952 pending
Bug #628952 [minidlna] minidlna: Possible unknown copyright status of hardcoded
image blobs in source code
Added tag(s) pending.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
628952:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 19:20, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote:
* Benoīt Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org [110606 11:57]:
I had a look at these, and I'm pretty sure they're not eligible for
copyright protection (a white 'N' on a blue background is not nearly
creative enough). So I don't
Hi,
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:59:11 +0200 Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
the source code file icons.c includes binary blobs detailing the NetGear
logo and the Tux logo.
Hi!
I am a debian-legal subscriber, and I would like to comment on this bug
report.
Thanks a lot for your
Package: minidlna
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
the source code file icons.c includes binary blobs detailing the NetGear
logo and the Tux logo.
While the source code is licensed under GPL2, the file in question only
states following:
* Penguin images are the creation of Larry
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:59:11 +0200 Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
Package: minidlna
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
the source code file icons.c includes binary blobs detailing the NetGear
logo and the Tux logo.
Hi!
I am a debian-legal subscriber, and I would like to comment on this
6 matches
Mail list logo