Josip Rodin dixit:
>I went on vacation in the meantime.
Ah, okay. No problem.
>Are you in a hurry?
No, just wondered about the total lack of communication,
which with a vacation would of course be expected. Hope
it went well.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Yay for having to rewrite other people's Bash s
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:00:48PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod???
>
> >Josip Rodin dixit:
> >
> >>You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do first test the
> >>situation where 'editorrc' is a slave to 'editor' so that you can be sure
> >
> >Yup, tested that. Took me qu
Dixi quod…
>Josip Rodin dixit:
>
>>You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do first test the
>>situation where 'editorrc' is a slave to 'editor' so that you can be sure
>
>Yup, tested that. Took me quite a few turns, too.
>The joe patch is attached, if you want me to upload this,
>j
Josip Rodin dixit:
>You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do first test the
>situation where 'editorrc' is a slave to 'editor' so that you can be sure
Yup, tested that. Took me quite a few turns, too.
The joe patch is attached, if you want me to upload this,
just tell me so. The
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:42:01PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >/var/lib/misc/editorrc could work?
>
> Sure would. Do you want me to prepare a patch for joe?
> If so, should I version it as NMU or regularily?
You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do fi
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I actually like the idea of making editorrc a slave to editor…
And this solution would indeed probably be the best, if it is possible.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I think that’s a lot more silly. Besides, wrapping
> would slow down and bloat.
It avoids the problem of editor and editorrc being out of sync.
Slowdown is imperceptible (which is the only thing that matters, since
joe is always used interactively). There is no memory c
Piotr Engelking dixit:
>I think that all of this silliness could be avoided, while perfectly
>reproducing current behavior, if jstar, joe, etc were wrappers, not
>symlinks:
I think that’s a lot more silly. Besides, wrapping
would slow down and bloat.
> #!/bin/bash
No bash in my code.
> if [
Josip Rodin dixit:
>/var/lib/misc/editorrc could work?
Sure would. Do you want me to prepare a patch for joe?
If so, should I version it as NMU or regularily?
bye,
//mirabilos
--
08:05⎜ mika: Does grml have an tool to read Apple
⎜System Log (asl) files? :)
08:08⎜ yeah. /bin/rm. ;)
Piotr Engelking wrote:
> #!/bin/bash
> if [ "x$(basename -- $0)" = xeditor ]; then
Sorry, insufficient quoting, the above should be of course:
if [ "x$(basename -- "$0")" = xeditor ]; then
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
I think that all of this silliness could be avoided, while perfectly
reproducing current behavior, if jstar, joe, etc were wrappers, not
symlinks:
#!/bin/bash
if [ "x$(basename -- $0)" = xeditor ]; then
progname=jstar
else
progname="$0"
fi
exec -a "$progname" /usr/lib/joe/joe.rea
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:10:20AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >The only question would be whether having a symlink called /etc/editorrc
> >would confuse non-joe users.
>
> Hm. Too bad we can't directly link to /etc/alternatives/editorrc...
> if you have any better plac
Josip Rodin dixit:
>The only question would be whether having a symlink called /etc/editorrc
>would confuse non-joe users.
Hm. Too bad we can't directly link to /etc/alternatives/editorrc...
if you have any better place for it (/var/**/editorrc?), tell so ;-)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“Having a smo
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:03:40AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Josip Rodin dixit:
>
> >And if you no longer have /etc/joe/editorrc but instead /etc/editorrc,
> >then that still requires source patching for joe to actually *read* it,
> >so you're back to square one.
>
> No that???s actually th
Josip Rodin dixit:
>And if you no longer have /etc/joe/editorrc but instead /etc/editorrc,
>then that still requires source patching for joe to actually *read* it,
>so you're back to square one.
No that’s actually the fun thing, just symlink it.
I have a symlink already:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:28:17PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >Maybe simply coding it differently inside joe will be the best solution -
> >if it notices that $self is 'editor', then don't just look for
> >/etc/joe/${self}rc but instead look itself up once again through
> >/etc/alternatives/ed
Josip Rodin dixit:
>What's with all the UTF-8 quotes? You're making your mails really hard to
>read and for no apparent reason...
Oh okay. UTF-8 works here.
>The problem with 'editorrc' is that it's really a joe-specific config file,
>so it doesn't make sense to move it out of /etc/joe.
Well, t
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 08:20:21PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just ran into a funny problem regarding update-alternatives
> and editorrc: if joe is installed, it wants /etc/joe/editorrc
> whereas jupp reads /etc/jupp/editorrc (I???ll use joe???s for now
> and symlink to it but that
Hi,
I just ran into a funny problem regarding update-alternatives
and editorrc: if joe is installed, it wants /etc/joe/editorrc
whereas jupp reads /etc/jupp/editorrc (I’ll use joe’s for now
and symlink to it but that will break when joe was installed,
jupp is selected and joe is then removed… prob
19 matches
Mail list logo
