On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:45:47PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6
> which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults 1.0.1
> released 12/4 depends on MPICH2, so we have a mix of architectures
> installed. And mpi-
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 20:50 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 14:41, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Hi Muammar,
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 11:59 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 23:28, Adam C Powell IV
> >> wrote:
> >> > tags 6523
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 23:28, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> tags 652313 patch
> thanks
>
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:23 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>> retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
>> block 652313 by 652312
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +010
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 652313 patch
Bug #652313 [src:scalapack] Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #652313 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6523
tags 652313 patch
thanks
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:23 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
> block 652313 by 652312
> thanks
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
Bug #652313 [src:scalapack] Rebuild with mpi-defaults >= 1.0
Changed Bug title to 'Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules' from 'Rebuild with
mpi-defaults >= 1.0'
> block 652313 by 652312
Bug #652
retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules
block 652313 by 652312
thanks
Hi Julien,
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> > > I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change
> > > rebuilds. But I've
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change
> > rebuilds. But I've been procrastinating maintenance on the rest (just
> > took care of spooles
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change
> rebuilds. But I've been procrastinating maintenance on the rest (just
> took care of spooles last night, working on hypre now) so this will
> motivate me to fi
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:45:47 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6
> > which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults 1.0.1
> > released 12/4
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:45:47 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6
> which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults 1.0.1
> released 12/4 depends on MPICH2, so we have a mix of architectures
> installed. And
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 651452 -1
Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam
(tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
Bug 651452 cloned as bug 652307.
> reassign -1 src:petsc
Bug #652307 [src:illuminator] illuminator: F
clone 651452 -1
reassign -1 src:petsc
retitle -1 Rebuild with mpi-defaults >= 1.0
found -1 3.1.dfsg-11.1
block 651452 by -1
clone 651452 -2
reassign -2 src:suitesparse
retitle -2 Rebuild with mpi-defaults >= 1.0
found -2 3.4.0-2
block -1 by -2
clone 651452 -3
reassign -3 src:spooles
retitle -3 Rebu
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> reopen 651452
> found 651452 0.11.0-12
> thanks
>
>
> Hi!
>
> * Adam C Powell IV [111214 15:33]:
>
> > Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi.
> > I'll test then upload -12 with this change and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 651452
Bug #651452 {Done: hazel...@debian.org ("Adam C. Powell, IV")}
[src:illuminator] illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam
(tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
'reopen' may be inappropriate when
reopen 651452
found 651452 0.11.0-12
thanks
Hi!
* Adam C Powell IV [111214 15:33]:
> Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi.
> I'll test then upload -12 with this change and let's see how it builds.
That didn't work, too: It fails to build on armel, sparc due to
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:09 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> reopen 651452
> retitle 651452 illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam
> (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
> found 651452 0.11.0-8.2
> clone 651452 -1
> retitle -1 illumin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 651452
Bug #651452 {Done: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl }
[src:illuminator] illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined
reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
y
reopen 651452
retitle 651452 illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam
(tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
found 651452 0.11.0-8.2
clone 651452 -1
retitle -1 illuminat: Build-Conflicts on libmpich2-dev to strict
thanks
Hi!
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [1112
X-Debbugs-Cc: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl , Julien
Cristau
Dear Alexander and Julien,
Please accept my apologies for uploading just now without incorporating
yoru recent changes. I had not seen your NMU uploads because they came
via the BTS system to debian-science-maintainers, a very high traffi
Hi!
Am 12.12.2011 13:45, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
> That being said, I uploaded the fix to delayed/4. Please tell me, if I
> should delay it longer.
Ups. I haven't, but did a direct upload. Sorry, forget the "-e 4" when
dput-ing it :(
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 651452 + patch
Bug #651452 [src:illuminator] illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o:
undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 651452 + pending
Bug #651452 [src:illuminator] illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (t
tags 651452 + patch
tags 651452 + pending
thanks
Hi!
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [111209 14:41]:
> However I get now the same FTBFS as originally reported. I guess we
> call that progress...
I think I solved the problem, however I only found a kind of grude
workarround, not a real solution.
T
Hi!
Am 09.12.2011 12:57, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
> Just a small update: I got the b-d installed smetana.debian.org.
> However, I fail to reproduce this bug: When I try to build the package,
> it FTBFS even sooner:
>
> checking for dgemv_ in -lblas... (cached) yes
> checking for dgetr
Hi!
Am 08.12.2011 20:00, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> See
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=illuminator&arch=sparc&ver=0.11.0-8.1&stamp=1323062646
>
>> /usr/lib/lam/bin/mpicc -g -O2 -o .libs/tsview tsview-tsview.o
>> libluminate/.libs/libluminate.so -lpetsc -lncurses -lhistory -lre
Source: illuminator
Version: 0.11.0-8.1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=illuminator&arch=sparc&ver=0.11.0-8.1&stamp=1323062646
> /usr/lib/la
27 matches
Mail list logo
