Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2012-03-23 at 23:39 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: I think we should drop ftpmaster from CC in further mails. Maybe, since they don't seem to care about this. But considering they decided to forbid waf, I think they should at least pay attention on how people is trying to cope with their

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Carsten Hey
* Carsten Hey [2012-04-15 20:32 +0200]: #=== # Waf-Data-Format: 1.0 # Waf-Version: 1.8 # Waf-Archive-Type: tar.gz # Waf-Archive-Base-Directory: wafadmin # Waf-Line-Feed-Replacement: ab # Waf-Carriage-Return-Replacement: xy #== #... #== -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-23 Thread Carsten Hey
I think we should drop ftpmaster from CC in further mails. * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-17 09:36 +0100]: On sam., 2012-03-17 at 02:45 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: waf scripts are not cleanly divided into python and data, but instead the python part contains also two two byte sequences (found

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-17 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2012-03-17 at 02:45 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: waf scripts are not cleanly divided into python and data, but instead the python part contains also two two byte sequences (found using brute force whilst building the waf script). My original plan was to ship two scripts

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-16 Thread Carsten Hey
waf scripts are not cleanly divided into python and data, but instead the python part contains also two two byte sequences (found using brute force whilst building the waf script). My original plan was to ship two scripts debian/waf-unpack and debian/waf-repack to provide an easy way to edit the

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-15 Thread Carsten Hey
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-15 11:11 +0100]: On sam., 2012-03-10 at 20:24 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On sam., 2012-03-10 at 19:12 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: * Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: Actually I was not using a waf command but instead well known tools installed on

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2012-03-15 at 20:32 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/midori.git;a=commitdiff;h=23b89cca6b96266eea166b30ac8d1591ffbf7b2f I don't assume this diff would make ftpmaster entirely happy. I'll send a NMU diff against midori/sid that adapts the

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Carsten Hey
* Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: I have to admit I'm not exactly sure what your point is. From where does the waf command you're using come from? ... Actually I was not using a waf command but instead well known tools installed on every