Bug#658593: pymvpa2: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.1.2: ValueError: too many values to unpack

2012-02-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Ah -- thanks Jakub, I have been playing with experimental one (-2) and have not spotted that there is a newer revision in sid. It seems to work nicely, so kudos for the fix! Since we are the PyMVPA upstream, there should be no problem adjusting it any way we like ;-) Building/verifying now and

Bug#658593: pymvpa2: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.1.2: ValueError: too many values to unpack

2012-02-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Yaroslav Halchenko , 2012-02-06, 23:37: upgrade to use sphinx's 1.1 autosummary didn't go that smooth -- I could be wrong but imho there is a regression in how autosummary/generate.py behaves -- imho now sphinx-autogen doesn't behave as it should have. Sounds very much like #611078. Assumin

Bug#658593: pymvpa2: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.1.2: ValueError: too many values to unpack

2012-02-06 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
since "tomorrow" has passed and I haven't pushed yet: upgrade to use sphinx's 1.1 autosummary didn't go that smooth -- I could be wrong but imho there is a regression in how autosummary/generate.py behaves -- imho now sphinx-autogen doesn't behave as it should have. Here is the post I have sent t

Bug#658593: pymvpa2: FTBFS with Sphinx 1.1.2: ValueError: too many values to unpack

2012-02-05 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
thank you guys for the report, patch, discussion I will upload the fix tomorrow -- it will revert to use sphinx's native generate whenever sphinx >= 1.1 (so old copy will remain inside to build docs on older releases of debian&ubuntu). Cheers! On Sat, 04 Feb 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Source: py