On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 13:13 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (24/11/2012):
> > It looks like those issues were fixed now, so we just need a final
> > d-i ack (there was a sort of one previously, but it's worth checking
> > it's still okay at this point).
>
> That looks OK to me: d-
Adam D. Barratt (24/11/2012):
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 20:07 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > There also seems to be a problem with building it on a couple of
> > architectures. I've sent a message to openjade@packages.d.o as
> > this is the tool that fails. I suspect it's a problem with one of
> >
[KiBi CCed for d-i ack]
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 20:07 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > For the record, this was uploaded; thanks. I've added an approve hint
> > but the package won't be able to migrate until we can add a
> > correspo
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 15:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 15:08:42 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > > I've already NMUed libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1 to sid to fix RC bug
> > > #668026 there. However I've also
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 15:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 15:08:42 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > I've already NMUed libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1 to sid to fix RC bug
> > #668026 there. However I've also discovered the bug is present in the
> > version currently in testing (2:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 15:08:42 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've already NMUed libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1 to sid to fix RC bug
> #668026 there. However I've also discovered the bug is present in the
> version currently in testing (2:0.1.12-20). I suppose the changes in -21
> to -23 ar
Hello Marcin,
Marcin Owsiany (22/09/2012):
> I've already NMUed libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1 to sid to fix RC bug
> #668026 there. However I've also discovered the bug is present in the
> version currently in testing (2:0.1.12-20). I suppose the changes in -21
> to -23 are not meant/eligible for inclu
Hello,
I've already NMUed libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1 to sid to fix RC bug
#668026 there. However I've also discovered the bug is present in the
version currently in testing (2:0.1.12-20). I suppose the changes in -21
to -23 are not meant/eligible for inclusion in testing, so I'd like to
upload 2:0.1.
8 matches
Mail list logo
