severity 671711 important
affects 671711 mono-tools
found 671711 dpkg/1.14.17
notfound 671711 monodoc-clutter-manual/1.0.0~alpha3~git20090817.r1.349dba6-8
notfound 671711 mono-tools/2.10-3
notfound 671711 octave-vrml/1.0.13-1
thanks
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 07:09:56 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 671711 important
Bug #671711 [dpkg] monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade from 'testing'
Bug #678848 [dpkg] liblapack3: octave has upgrade problems: liblapack.so.3gf:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Severity set
Hi there,
[ dropping -devel ]
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 07:09:56AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
[…]
Hmmm, so I had prepared a patch which basically checks if the package
has its dependencies fulfilled before calling the postinst script with
triggered, and otherwise defers the trigger
Hi!
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:12:14 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[…]
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 08:30:28 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
Thanks a lot for your analysis. So it seems like this is the assumption
that isn't being held here: that dependencies will be satisfied when
postinst is run.
It would be great if you could prepare a patch. This issue could come up
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 671711 dpkg
Bug #671711 [dpkg] monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade from 'testing'
Ignoring request to reassign bug #671711 to the same package
affects 671711 src:monodoc-browser
Bug #671711 [dpkg] monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade from
@raleigh',
'request_subject', ...) called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 528
eval {...} called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 527
affects 671711 src:monodoc-browser
Bug #671711 [dpkg] monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade from 'testing'
Failed to mark 671711 as affecting package(s): failed
: monodoc-browser: fails to upgrade) from 'testing'):
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[…]
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
Greetings,
[ @ debian-dpkg, there is a question for you below ]
Thanks for the report.
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[…]
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the
Package: monodoc-browser
Version: 2.10-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
From the attached log (scroll
10 matches
Mail list logo
