On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:57:14 +0200, bodr...@mail.dm.unipi.it wrote:
> Anyway, the following workaround may solve the problem:
>
> http://gmplib.org:8000/gmp-5.0/rev/ffdad0cda019
>
Thanks, much appreciated.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.or
Dear Debian developers,
I believe that the error is in the cpuid emulated by the VM.
Anyway, the following workaround may solve the problem:
http://gmplib.org:8000/gmp-5.0/rev/ffdad0cda019
The package should be built with --enable-fat, in my opinion.
Best regards,
Marco
--
http://bodrato.it/p
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 09:26:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > As I'd like this fixed ASAP to get the buildds back in working
> > > condition, I'll be preparing a NMU with --disable-fat. Please yell if
> > > you think I shouldn't upload it.
Thanks for this.
-Steve
signature.asc
Descrip
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 19:43:41 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Julien Cristau [Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:19:15PM +0200]:
> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 22:09:55 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting. It could well be the configure option. For the past 6
> > > years, Debian
Hi,
* Julien Cristau [Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:19:15PM +0200]:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 22:09:55 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > Interesting. It could well be the configure option. For the past 6
> > years, Debian built using --disable-fat on amd64. I changed it
> > because there are both
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 22:09:55 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Interesting. It could well be the configure option. For the past 6
> years, Debian built using --disable-fat on amd64. I changed it
> because there are both bug workarounds and code speedups that are
> processor-based. So it mak
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 22:09:55 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On the other hand, I just looked at the source diff and there is a
> change in configure.guess that changes the behaviour for a 64-bit
> "vmkernel". Could this be affecting your virtual machine?
>
Oh, and that change seems to be f
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 22:09:55 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On the other hand, I just looked at the source diff and there is a
> change in configure.guess that changes the behaviour for a 64-bit
> "vmkernel". Could this be affecting your virtual machine?
>
> @@ -1315,6 +1325,9 @@
> i*
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:09:55PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:54:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 21:35:58 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > * Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:08:40PM +0200]:
> > > > it
On 08.05.2012 04:17, Laurent Fousse wrote:
Hi,
* Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:54:18PM +0200]:
I haven't tried that, won't get to it today. However as a data
point
the crash seemed to (mostly? only?) affect VM guests, rather than
physical hosts. A local rebuild with --disable-fat s
Hi,
* Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:54:18PM +0200]:
> I haven't tried that, won't get to it today. However as a data point
> the crash seemed to (mostly? only?) affect VM guests, rather than
> physical hosts. A local rebuild with --disable-fat seemed not to crash,
> but I haven't tried
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:54:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 21:35:58 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > * Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:08:40PM +0200]:
> > > it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
> > > causes gcc
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 21:35:58 +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> * Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:08:40PM +0200]:
> > it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
> > causes gcc to ICE on the buildds.
> > See e.g.
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch
Hello,
* Julien Cristau [Mon, May 07, 2012 at 06:08:40PM +0200]:
> it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
> causes gcc to ICE on the buildds.
> See e.g.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ufraw&arch=amd64&ver=0.18-1.1%2Bb2&stamp=1336402119
It would be int
I see the same issue and have an easy reproducer. Downgrade to
libgmp10 from wheezy fixes it.
$ cat reproducer.c
void stupid()
{
int i;
unsigned int val = 0;
for (i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
val *= 1;
}
}
$ /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/cc1 -quiet -imultilib . -imultiarch
x8
Source: gmp
Version: 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
it looks like the update from gmp 2:5.0.4+dfsg-1 to 2:5.0.5+dfsg-1
causes gcc to ICE on the buildds.
See e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ufraw&arch=amd64&ver=0.18-1.1%2Bb2&stamp=133
16 matches
Mail list logo
