Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2012-07-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
Are the release team willing to accept a squid-3.2.1 stable release upload 4-6 weeks after Wheezy freeze? That upload will close this RC bug, a CVE security bug in both squid and squid3 packages, and a number of regular bugs. Notice the Ubuntu effort to migrate 2.7 package to 3.1 ahead of up

Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2012-07-09 Thread Luigi Gangitano
Hi Amos, I suspect that such exception will not be the case, but will contact RT and ask for an opinion. Can you please tell me a date when 3.2.1 is expected? Regards, L -- Luigi Gangitano -- -- GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 GPG: 4096R/2BA97CED: 8D48

Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2012-10-01 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
tags 672156 + wheezy-ignore thanks On 02/07/2012 04:07, Amos Jeffries wrote: Are the release team willing to accept a squid-3.2.1 stable release upload 4-6 weeks after Wheezy freeze? That upload will close this RC bug, a CVE security bug in both squid and squid3 packages, and a number of regula

Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2013-05-10 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:11:54PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > tags 672156 + wheezy-ignore > thanks > > On 02/07/2012 04:07, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> Are the release team willing to accept a squid-3.2.1 stable release >> upload 4-6 weeks after Wheezy freeze? >> >> That upload will close this RC bug

Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2013-05-13 Thread Luigi Gangitano
Hi Moritz, Il giorno 10/mag/2013, alle ore 18:45, Moritz Muehlenhoff ha scritto: > Wheezy has released with squid and squid3, can we go ahead with the removal > of squid now? With the help of Amos, I've uploaded a new squid3 package that is compatible with (almost all) squid3 features and am

Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2013-05-16 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 06:33:21PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > Il giorno 10/mag/2013, alle ore 18:45, Moritz Muehlenhoff > ha scritto: > > Wheezy has released with squid and squid3, can we go ahead with the removal > > of squid now? > > > With the help of Amos, I've uploaded

Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2012-05-13 Thread Amos Jeffries
Upstream is working on a clean transition from (squid | squid3) -> squid 3.2 without the need for a removal bump. At this time it is not completely clear whether a 3.2 package will make Wheezy before freeze. I'm hopeful though. Amos (upstream maintainer) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2012-05-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: squid Severity: serious I remember some discussion before the Squeeze release about both squid and squid3 being included in a stable release and thus needing double security updates. >From what I remember squid3 still lacked some features at that time and having both in Squeeze was meant

Processed: Re: Bug#672156: Should be dropped in favour of squid3

2012-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 672156 + wheezy-ignore Bug #672156 [squid] Should be dropped in favour of squid3 Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg