Bug#674728: chromium FTBFS on armel and armhf

2012-07-06 Thread shawn
this patch (along with above skia fixup) allowed me to build chromium on armel (but it SIGSEGVs on startup, which I have filed another bug report) diff --git a/src/third_party/libvpx/libvpx.gyp b/src/third_party/libvpx/libvpx.gyp index 590f435..618cac5 100644 ---

Bug#674728: chromium FTBFS on armel and armhf

2012-07-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Shawn, shawn wrote: --- a/src/third_party/libvpx/libvpx.gyp +++ b/src/third_party/libvpx/libvpx.gyp @@ -281,11 +281,17 @@ { 'target_name': 'libvpx_include', 'type': 'none', - 'direct_dependent_settings': { -'include_dirs': [ - 'source/libvpx',

Bug#674728: chromium FTBFS on armel and armhf

2012-05-31 Thread Jonathan Nieder
shawn wrote: now starting the program yields: [2:2:1390478143810:ERROR:data_pack.cc(133)] Entry #3 in data pack points off end of file. Was the file corrupted? [2:2:1390478145001:FATAL:resource_bundle_posix.cc(56)] Check failed: resources_data_. failed to load chrome.pak Does that happen

Bug#674728: chromium FTBFS on armel and armhf

2012-05-31 Thread shawn
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 00:46 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: shawn wrote: now starting the program yields: [2:2:1390478143810:ERROR:data_pack.cc(133)] Entry #3 in data pack points off end of file. Was the file corrupted? [2:2:1390478145001:FATAL:resource_bundle_posix.cc(56)] Check

Bug#674728: chromium: FTBFS on armel and armhf

2012-05-26 Thread shawn
Package: chromium Version: latest Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) From ccca008f9fd8b38b6191b01457380d080bb6d3a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shawn Landden shawnland...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 19:49:08 -0700