Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:17:29 +0000
with message-id <e1smpst-00018u...@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#676204: fixed in ruby-mkrf 0.2.3+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #676204,
regarding ruby-mkrf: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
676204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-mkrf
Version: 0.2.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120605 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory `/«BUILDDIR»/ruby-mkrf-0.2.3+dfsg'
> touch test/fixtures/some_binary
> chmod +x test/fixtures/some_binary
> dh_auto_install
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/psych_tree.rb:31: warning: method redefined; 
> discarding old visit_String
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/psych_tree.rb:4: warning: previous definition of 
> visit_String was here
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/psych_tree.rb:39: warning: method redefined; 
> discarding old register
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/psych_tree.rb:12: warning: previous definition 
> of register was here
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/psych_tree.rb:43: warning: method redefined; 
> discarding old format_time
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/psych_tree.rb:16: warning: previous definition 
> of format_time was here
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/syck_hack.rb:115: warning: method redefined; 
> discarding old to_s
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/syck_hack.rb:44: warning: previous definition of 
> to_s was here
>   Entering dh_ruby --install
> install -d 
> /«BUILDDIR»/ruby-mkrf-0.2.3+dfsg/debian/ruby-mkrf/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby
> install -D -m644 lib/mkrf.rb 
> /«BUILDDIR»/ruby-mkrf-0.2.3+dfsg/debian/ruby-mkrf/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mkrf.rb
> install -D -m644 lib/mkrf/generator.rb 
> /«BUILDDIR»/ruby-mkrf-0.2.3+dfsg/debian/ruby-mkrf/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mkrf/generator.rb
> install -D -m644 lib/mkrf/rakehelper.rb 
> /«BUILDDIR»/ruby-mkrf-0.2.3+dfsg/debian/ruby-mkrf/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mkrf/rakehelper.rb
> install -D -m644 lib/mkrf/availability.rb 
> /«BUILDDIR»/ruby-mkrf-0.2.3+dfsg/debian/ruby-mkrf/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/mkrf/availability.rb
> /usr/bin/ruby1.8 -I/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gem2deb/test_runner.rb
> Loaded suite debian/ruby-tests
> Started
> ...............................FF.
> Finished in 3.914195 seconds.
> 
>   1) Failure:
> test_that_libxml_compiles(TestSampleProjects)
>     [./test/unit/../abstract_unit.rb:42:in `assert_creates_file'
>      ./test/integration/test_sample_projects.rb:20:in 
> `test_that_libxml_compiles']:
> ./test/integration/../sample_files/libxml-ruby-0.3.8/ext/xml/libxml_so.so 
> wasn't created!.
> <false> is not true.
> 
>   2) Failure:
> test_that_syck_compiles(TestSampleProjects)
>     [./test/unit/../abstract_unit.rb:42:in `assert_creates_file'
>      ./test/integration/test_sample_projects.rb:20:in 
> `test_that_syck_compiles']:
> ./test/integration/../sample_files/syck-0.55/ext/ruby/ext/syck/syck.so wasn't 
> created!.
> <false> is not true.
> 
> 34 tests, 64 assertions, 2 failures, 0 errors
> ERROR: Test "ruby1.8" failed. Exiting.
> dh_auto_install: dh_ruby --install 
> /«BUILDDIR»/ruby-mkrf-0.2.3+dfsg/debian/ruby-mkrf returned exit code 1
> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_install] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/06/05/ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-mkrf
Source-Version: 0.2.3+dfsg-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby-mkrf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/r/ruby-mkrf/ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.dsc
  to main/r/ruby-mkrf/ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.dsc
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2_all.deb
  to main/r/ruby-mkrf/ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 676...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Cédric Boutillier <cedric.boutill...@gmail.com> (supplier of updated ruby-mkrf 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:34:26 +0200
Source: ruby-mkrf
Binary: ruby-mkrf
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.3+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers 
<pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Cédric Boutillier <cedric.boutill...@gmail.com>
Description: 
 ruby-mkrf  - Ruby library generating Rakefiles to build C extensions to Ruby
Closes: 676204
Changes: 
 ruby-mkrf (0.2.3+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add 0400_use_correct_ruby_version_in_tests.patch:
       Use the same Ruby binary to run the tests and to build test Rakefiles.
       This is needed to test the library correctly against the different
       versions of the Ruby interpreter in Debian.
   * Add 0500_replace_config_by_rbconfig.patch
       Use RbConfig:: instead of Config:: deprecated in Ruby 1.8 and 1.9.
       Making this slight change avoids avoid annoying warnings.
   * Add 0600_fix_test_libxml.patch 0610_fix_test_syck.patch
       Port code built during tests to Ruby1.9 (Closes: #676204).
       Although this is not part of the mkrf library itself, this is needed to
       test the library correctly with the various Ruby interpreter.
   * Add 9900_debug_test_failures.patch
       Make the test suite output more verbose, to get enough info if something
       goes wrong during the build.
   * Bump Standards-Version: to 3.9.3 (no changes needed)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 fd18121718c72321c253b9e9c2d3c7332cbf924c 2107 ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.dsc
 439509d6b8c025684fe458dc83099387a50ec593 10928 
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
 7c468d138985d6cd42ffa7d39692247de0fff665 15888 ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 b744ef27a10bbf558891c27fb84291e3f361230504e6f200cef3f2d030adb1d4 2107 
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.dsc
 059d1a103d7b135310233f9706875479863875d2855ecbea31969b3a58ec97a5 10928 
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
 870771b32979b23e8c58c320f2006daef05d8eea09442ac852195621840be7dc 15888 
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2_all.deb
Files: 
 c7906bc6ad9668259aead488e6cf603e 2107 ruby optional ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.dsc
 b2ab8d70a581a89d49c85404d33d50b1 10928 ruby optional 
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz
 635d3224508cb41e4962817dac170e7c 15888 ruby optional 
ruby-mkrf_0.2.3+dfsg-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=aZ2D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to