Bug#614907: [Pkg-mediawiki-devel] [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Thorsten Glaser writes ("Bug#614907: [Pkg-mediawiki-devel] [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions"): > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Ah. Luckily, that’s almost resolved. > > It has been resolved f

Bug#614907: [Pkg-mediawiki-devel] [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > Right now I am waiting for the judgement of the tech-ctte regarding > > nodejs. See bug#614907. > > Ah. Luckily, that’s almost resolved. It has been resolved for days now, would please someone implement the solution? I can, as offered previously,

Bug#679665: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-11 at 09:22am, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Because it performs worse, which makes it less used in general, > > which makes it less tested, which makes it less trustworthy. I > > thought that was already clarified at bug#679665. Does it m

Bug#614907: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Because it performs worse, which makes it less used in general, which > makes it less tested, which makes it less trustworthy. I thought that > was already clarified at bug#679665. Does it make sense now? Thanks, yes. > It is helpful that you in

Bug#614907: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[keeping all recipients - don't blame me for the noise] On 12-07-10 at 03:58pm, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I am concerned about switching compressor - see the discussion at > > bug#679665. > > I see. (But yui was used before, right? Why the switch a

Bug#614907: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Right now I am waiting for the judgement of the tech-ctte regarding > nodejs. See bug#614907. Ah. Luckily, that’s almost resolved. > I am concerned about switching compressor - see the discussion at > bug#679665. I see. (But yui was used before,

Bug#680080: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-10 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Thorsten, On 12-07-10 at 01:46pm, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > can *please* be something done about this, so we can ship a version of > mediawiki-extensions that actually matches the version on mediawiki > shipped in wheezy? > > What, exactly, needs to be done in/for json-js? Can I help? I’ve go

Bug#680080: Invalidated by dependency: Excuse for mediawiki-extensions

2012-07-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, can *please* be something done about this, so we can ship a version of mediawiki-extensions that actually matches the version on mediawiki shipped in wheezy? What, exactly, needs to be done in/for json-js? Can I help? I’ve got Super Co^W^WDebian Developer Upload Powers. AFAICS, uglifyjs shou