On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:38:37AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> > None of these are merged into 0.5.x, has the code diverged so much?
>>
>> I arrived only today from my two week trip and will work on backports
>> for 0.7-0.5 this we
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:38:37AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > None of these are merged into 0.5.x, has the code diverged so much?
>
> I arrived only today from my two week trip and will work on backports
> for 0.7-0.5 this week. Sorry for the delay.
Merry christmas Reinhard,
did you have
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:00:54PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> > Source: libav
>> > Severity: grave
>> > Justification: user security hole
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > it see
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:00:54PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Source: libav
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: user security hole
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav
>
> short
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Source: libav
> Severity: grave
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav
short status update:
Most/all of the CVEs have now been backported upstream. Before
release
Source: libav
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav and are
supposed to be fixed in 0.11:
CVE-2012-2772
CVE-2012-2774
CVE-2012-2775
CVE-2012-2776
CVE-2012-2777
CVE-2012-2779
CVE-2012-2782
CVE-2012-2783
CVE-2012-2
6 matches
Mail list logo
