On 2012-10-07 at 00:47:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > As far as upstream is concerned there is no issue so unless there are any
> > objections I'm going to lower bug severity to avoid giving release team
> > wrong
> > impression regarding criticality of this bug.
>
> I'd consider this as a reason
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:52:35PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Dear team members,
>
> Just to double check on the course of action regarding #688952:
>
> As far as upstream is concerned there is no issue so unless there are any
> objections I'm going to lower bug severity to avoid giving
Hi all.We apologize for the inconvenience.It's a errata from the ancient times. We do not (and won't) intend to include any additional clause to the LGPL v3 to the Ginkgo CADx source code.We will remove that in next software releases.Please, let us know if you need we re-publish any source distribu
Dear Carlos,
Could you please comment on the following issue within debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/688952
It appears that the license says:
...
The GINKGO_CADX_LICENSE.txt file includes the following text:
This software musn't be sold without prior approval of the authors.
...
Is this c
Package: ginkgocadx
Version: 2.12.0.4889-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
The GINKGO_CADX_LICENSE.txt file includes the following text:
This software musn't be sold without prior approval of the authors.
which seems to violate DFSG#1.
Cheers,
Francois
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
5 matches
Mail list logo