Bug#688952: ginkgocadx: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-06 Thread Francois Marier
On 2012-10-07 at 00:47:34, Andreas Tille wrote: > > As far as upstream is concerned there is no issue so unless there are any > > objections I'm going to lower bug severity to avoid giving release team > > wrong > > impression regarding criticality of this bug. > > I'd consider this as a reason

Bug#688952: ginkgocadx: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 07:52:35PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Dear team members, > > Just to double check on the course of action regarding #688952: > > As far as upstream is concerned there is no issue so unless there are any > objections I'm going to lower bug severity to avoid giving

Bug#688952: ginkgocadx: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-02 Thread Carlos Barrales Ruiz
Hi all.We apologize for the inconvenience.It's a errata from the ancient times. We do not (and won't) intend to include any additional clause to the LGPL v3 to the Ginkgo CADx source code.We will remove that in next software releases.Please, let us know if you need we re-publish any source distribu

Bug#688952: ginkgocadx: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-02 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Dear Carlos, Could you please comment on the following issue within debian: http://bugs.debian.org/688952 It appears that the license says: ... The GINKGO_CADX_LICENSE.txt file includes the following text: This software musn't be sold without prior approval of the authors. ... Is this c

Bug#688952: ginkgocadx: Package appears to be non-free

2012-09-27 Thread Francois Marier
Package: ginkgocadx Version: 2.12.0.4889-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 The GINKGO_CADX_LICENSE.txt file includes the following text: This software musn't be sold without prior approval of the authors. which seems to violate DFSG#1. Cheers, Francois -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email