Quoting Colin Watson (2012-10-01 14:01:45)
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 01:37:54PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > It is not necessary to modify package.json.
>
> No, it's not necessary, but I don't believe in leaving some bits of a
> package unpatched, in case a user wants to make use of them even
>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 01:37:54PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> It is not necessary to modify package.json.
No, it's not necessary, but I don't believe in leaving some bits of a
package unpatched, in case a user wants to make use of them even though
the Debian build process doesn't. Drop that part
Hi,
thank you for your report,
On 01/10/2012 13:30, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: eyes.js
> Version: 0.1.7-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch quantal
>
> eyes.js fails to build in unstable following the node -> nodejs
Package: eyes.js
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch quantal
eyes.js fails to build in unstable following the node -> nodejs
renaming. Here's a patch to take account of that.
* Cope with node -> nodejs renaming
4 matches
Mail list logo