Bug#690169: reportbug: incorrectly labels a binary package choice as Source:

2014-10-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:48:53 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Control: severity -1 critical Arguably this should even be considered RC and/or considered for a stable update (assuming the fix is not too intrusive), because a lot of bugs can get lost, including important ones (RC,

Bug#690169: reportbug: incorrectly labels a binary package choice as Source:

2014-10-27 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 27 oct 14, 19:07:24, gregor herrmann wrote: On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:48:53 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Control: severity -1 critical Arguably this should even be considered RC and/or considered for a stable update (assuming the fix is not too intrusive), because a lot of

Bug#690169: reportbug: incorrectly labels a binary package choice as Source:

2014-10-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 21:46:50 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: Hm ... While I agreed that this bug is annoying, critical [0] seems a tad over the top. If it were my call, I'd stay with the previously used important severity. Critical might be a tad too much, but definitely 'serious' (i.e. RC).