On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:13:25PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> > OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
> > module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
>
> This seems like a paper exercise which I doubt is worth
On Mon, May 13, 2013 15:31, Walter Landry wrote:
> "Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote:
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
>>> OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
>>> module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
>>
>> This seems like a paper exercise which I
"Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
>> OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
>> module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
>
> This seems like a paper exercise which I doubt is worth our efforts.
>
> I seems extremely unli
On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
> module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
This seems like a paper exercise which I doubt is worth our efforts.
I seems extremely unlikely that the author of the software c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/15/2012 07:00 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> They seem to think it's a self-made, Debian-only problem.
Isn't it a common attitude of this upstream team to get other people
responsible for issues?
Just my 2 cents, Jan.
- --
Never write mail to , yo
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Since Fedora doesn't consider the json license as "good" [1], it seems
> we are not the only ones having this problem.
>
> Have you checked what other distros are doing about that, especially
> Fedora?
>
Fedora says it's bad, but they sti
6 matches
Mail list logo
