Bug#695794: vcdimager: diff for NMU version 0.7.24+dfsg-0.1

2013-01-02 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi David, On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 11:17:11AM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > > I think the confusion is simply based on debdiff being smart, not > differencing the repacked and the patch part. The offending files are > really removed from the repacked source tarball as you can check it in: > > http

Bug#695794: vcdimager: diff for NMU version 0.7.24+dfsg-0.1

2013-01-01 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Nicolas, Le 01/01/2013 10:58, Nicolas Boullis a écrit : > However, as far as I understand it, your patch is not correct since it > looks like you did not remove the offending files from the source > tarball, and it includes the content of thos

Bug#695794: vcdimager: diff for NMU version 0.7.24+dfsg-0.1

2013-01-01 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Dear David, On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:17:37AM -0400, David Prévot wrote: > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for vcdimager (versioned as 0.7.24+dfsg-0.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Thanks for your interest in the vcdimag