Hi David,
On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 11:17:11AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>
> I think the confusion is simply based on debdiff being smart, not
> differencing the repacked and the patch part. The offending files are
> really removed from the repacked source tarball as you can check it in:
>
> http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Nicolas,
Le 01/01/2013 10:58, Nicolas Boullis a écrit :
> However, as far as I understand it, your patch is not correct since it
> looks like you did not remove the offending files from the source
> tarball, and it includes the content of thos
Dear David,
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:17:37AM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for vcdimager (versioned as 0.7.24+dfsg-0.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for your interest in the vcdimag
3 matches
Mail list logo