Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2013-01-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:46:58 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Ivo De Decker dixit: Here is a patch that fixes the build: Wow, thanks for your quick reaction! This indeed fixes the build failure; I uploaded to unreleased for the time being. Hm, not sure what unreleased here means; but I don't

Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2013-01-05 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Gregor, On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 11:51:38PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:46:58 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Ivo De Decker dixit: Here is a patch that fixes the build: Wow, thanks for your quick reaction! This indeed fixes the build failure; I uploaded to

Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2013-01-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ivo De Decker dixit: This indeed fixes the build failure; I uploaded to unreleased for the time being. Hm, not sure what unreleased here means; I had to search for this myself. Apparently 'unreleased' is the codename for the suite on debian-ports.org that has uploads that aren't in the

Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2013-01-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:23:17 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hm, not sure what unreleased here means; I had to search for this myself. Apparently 'unreleased' is the codename for the suite on debian-ports.org that has uploads that aren't in the main debian archive. See

Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2012-12-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… Ivo De Decker dixit: Here is a patch that fixes the build: Wow, thanks for your quick reaction! This indeed fixes the build failure; I uploaded to unreleased for the time being. bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting,

Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2012-12-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Ivo De Decker dixit: Oh. I used reportbug --from-buildd= option. Apparently it does not DTRT but parse the filename. Thanks, will not use it in the future or do manual checking. Isn't that a bug in reportbug, then? I don’t know. The --from-buildd=srcpkg_vsn option is designed for bugreports

Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2012-12-22 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: notfound -1 2.1~release-5 Control: found -1 1:2.1~release-5 Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 unreproducible Hi Thorsten, On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:26:07PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Source: festival Version: 2.1~release-5 You missed the epoch here. I adjusted the

Bug#696507: festival: FTBFS: not multi-arch capable but a dependency is multiarchified already

2012-12-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Source: festival Version: 2.1~release-5 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Apparently, festival seems to hardcode /usr/lib as libdir. Since Multi-Arch, this assumption is no longer valid, see for example #626877 for a similar case.