Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 01:33:58PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:59 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Assuming there will be also either a DSA or a pu for pyrad, how should that be versioned?

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-24 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 06:09:45PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 01:33:58PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:59 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Assuming there will

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-24 Thread Jeremy Lainé
On 02/23/2013 02:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:59 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Once 1.2-1+deb7u1 reaches wheezy (next 24 hours) we will be able to use 1.2-1+deb6u1 for any hypothetical DSA to slot in between squeeze and wheezy. Well, there's a 1.2.1+deb6u1 in

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:59 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Assuming there will be also either a DSA or a pu for pyrad, how should that be versioned? Traditionally for Squeeze it was +squeeze1, but: [...] Once

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-17 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:36:24AM +0100, Jeremy Lainé wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/17/2013 01:19 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: It's traditional to seek approval *before* uploading; more so in this case since adding a patch system is a no-no. The change

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-17 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: I was involved reporting the problem: I noticed now a possible problem about the versioning: Current situation: pyrad | 1.2-1| squeeze| source pyrad | 1.2-1| wheezy | source pyrad |

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-16 Thread Jeremy Lainé
Dear release team, Yesterday the following security vulnerability in the pyrad package was brought to my attention by Salvatore Bonaccorso: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-0294 It is tracked in the following bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700669 I

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:16:32AM +0100, Jeremy Lainé wrote: Dear release team, Yesterday the following security vulnerability in the pyrad package was brought to my attention by Salvatore Bonaccorso: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-0294 It is tracked in the

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-16 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi all On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:19:00AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:16:32AM +0100, Jeremy Lainé wrote: Dear release team, Yesterday the following security vulnerability in the pyrad package was brought to my attention by Salvatore Bonaccorso:

Bug#700669: Allow pyrad 1.2-1+deb7u1 into wheezy

2013-02-16 Thread Jeremy Lainé
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/17/2013 01:19 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: It's traditional to seek approval *before* uploading; more so in this case since adding a patch system is a no-no. The change itself is fine, please upload with this only. You will have to bump