Hi, Am Sonntag, den 07.04.2013, 13:40 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess: > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > If you want to avoid cdbs, I’d be happy to see dh support Haskell, but > > it should use the same building steps as haskell-devscripts now, I’d > > think. > > I don't know if it's worth putting in the time to make debhelper support > haskell library packages, but it certianly makes sense for it to > automatically handle packages that simply build binaries from a cabal > file. I hope to see an increasing number of such packages in Debian.
I don’t think that there is such a big difference there. The commands called are the same (compile Setup.*hs, configure, build, install with --destdir), and the library-sepecifc stuff is already in dh_haskell_* commands that should go well with dh. OTOH thinks work well now, so there is no pressing need to change the running system. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
