Bug#708956: [Bug-jwhois] Bug#708956: Bug#708956: [jwhois] GFDL non free license

2016-08-29 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Hello, Mathieu Lirzin writes: > Yuan-Chen Cheng writes: > >> Shall we just remove those two file from the install list and live >> with that ? >> >> I am interested to provide patch to do that if that’s the possible and >> legal way to do. [...] > IIUC correctly

Bug#708956: [Bug-jwhois] Bug#708956: [jwhois] GFDL non free license

2016-08-10 Thread Mathieu Lirzin
Yuan-Chen Cheng writes: > Hi, I write a email to bug-jwh...@gnu.org last week but get no reply. > > Shall we just remove those two file from the install list and live > with that ? > > I am interested to provide patch to do that if that’s the possible and > legal way to do. > >

Bug#708956: [jwhois] GFDL non free license

2016-07-31 Thread Yuan-Chen Cheng
Hi, I write a email to bug-jwh...@gnu.org last week but get no reply. Shall we just remove those two file from the install list and live with that ? I am interested to provide patch to do that if that’s the possible and legal way to do. thanks, YC

Bug#708956: [jwhois] GFDL non free license

2013-05-22 Thread Jonas Öberg
The copyright holder of jwhois is the FSF. I don't know what their policy on re-licensing is though I guess it's not the first Debian bug to encounter this :-) On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:22 PM, bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: Package: jwhois Severity: serious user:

Bug#708956: [jwhois] GFDL non free license

2013-05-19 Thread bastien ROUCARIES
Package: jwhois Severity: serious user: debian...@lists.debian.org usertags: gfdl-invariant The folowing file (manually checked) are non free with invariant version. doc/jwhois.texi doc/jwhois.info Could you please check if upstream is willing to relicense. Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,